The Source For News On Capitol Hill Since 1955

Last updated Sep. 08, 2014

Sorry, you are using an old browser that can't display this interactive. Install the free Google Chrome Frame plug-in for Internet Explorer, or use a modern browser such as Google Chrome, Firefox or a mobile device, such as an iPad, to view this page.

Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.)


Biography
District: 1st District
Political Highlights: sought Democratic nomination for R.I. Senate, 1992; R.I. House, 1995-2003; mayor of Providence, 2003-11; U.S. House, 2011-present
Born: July 15, 1961; Providence, R.I.
Residence: Providence
Religion: Jewish
Family: Single
Education: Brown U., A.B. 1983; Georgetown U., J.D. 1986
Military Service: None
Start of Service: Elected: 2010 (2nd term)
Committee Assignments: Foreign Affairs (Africa, Global Health, Global Human Rights & International Organizations; Middle East & North Africa); Judiciary (Courts, Intellectual Property & the Internet; Regulatory Reform, Commercial & Antitrust Law)

Election History
YearElectionCandidateVotes%
2012generalDavid Cicilline (D) 108,61253.0
Brendan Doherty (R) 83,73740.8
David Vogel (I) 12,5046.1
2010generalDavid Cicilline (D) 81,26950.6
John Loughlin (R) 71,54244.6
Kenneth Capalbo (I) 6,4244.0
Gregory Raposa (I) 1,3340.8
Roll Call Vitals

2014 Race Rating

(District: RI-01)
 
Safe Democrat


See Also:

(Full Race Ratings Map)

279th

on the House Seniority List

Fellow Rhode Island Rep. Jim Langevin (D) is 130th.

34th

Rhode Island is 34th on Roll Call's Clout Index, which measures influence in Congress by state.

2,203

Twitter Followers (@repcicilline)

Rep. David Cicilline has no appearances on Sunday talk shows.

Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) has the most appearances so far this year.











Roll Call and CQ Weekly use ratings assigned by the Rothenberg Political Report, which are defined as follows: SAFE: As of today, the party indicated is all but certain to win the seat. FAVORED: One candidate has a substantial advantage, but an upset is still possible. LEAN: The party indicated has the edge, but the outcome is less certain than for races rated as favored. TILT: The outcome is effectively regarded as a tossup for each of these highly competitive seats, although the party indicated has a slight edge. TOSSUP: Neither party has an edge in these contests.