The Source For News On Capitol Hill Since 1955

Last updated Sep. 08, 2014

Sorry, you are using an old browser that can't display this interactive. Install the free Google Chrome Frame plug-in for Internet Explorer, or use a modern browser such as Google Chrome, Firefox or a mobile device, such as an iPad, to view this page.

Rep. Mark Amodei (R-Nev.)


Biography
District: 2nd District
Political Highlights: Republican nominee for Nev. System of Higher Education Board of Regents, 1994; Nev. Assembly, 1996-98; Nev. Senate, 1998-2010; Nev. Republican Party Chairman, 2010-11; U.S. House, 2011-present
Born: June 12, 1958; Carson City, Nev.
Residence: Carson City
Religion: Christian
Family: Divorced; two children
Education: U. of Nevada, B.A. 1980; U. of the Pacific, J.D. 1983
Military Service: Army, 1983-87
Start of Service: Elected: 2011 (1st full term)
Committee Assignments: Appropriations (Commerce-Justice-Science; Financial Services; Legislative Branch)

Election History
YearElectionCandidateVotes%
2012generalMark Amodei (R) 162,21357.6
Samuel Koepnick (D) 102,01936.2
Michael Haines (I) 11,1664.0
Russell Best (IA) 6,0512.2
2011specialMark Amodei (R) 75,18057.9
Kate Marshall (D) 46,81836.1
Helmuth Lehmann (I) 5,3724.1
Tim Fasano (IA) 2,4211.9
Roll Call Vitals

2014 Race Rating

(District: NV-02)
 
Safe Republican


See Also:

(Full Race Ratings Map)

345th

on the House Seniority List

Fellow Nevada Rep. Joe Heck (R) is 302nd.

48th

Nevada is 48th on Roll Call's Clout Index, which measures influence in Congress by state.

4,498

Twitter Followers (@MarkAmodeiNV2)

Rep. Mark Amodei has no appearances on Sunday talk shows.

Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) has the most appearances so far this year.











Roll Call and CQ Weekly use ratings assigned by the Rothenberg Political Report, which are defined as follows: SAFE: As of today, the party indicated is all but certain to win the seat. FAVORED: One candidate has a substantial advantage, but an upset is still possible. LEAN: The party indicated has the edge, but the outcome is less certain than for races rated as favored. TILT: The outcome is effectively regarded as a tossup for each of these highly competitive seats, although the party indicated has a slight edge. TOSSUP: Neither party has an edge in these contests.