The Source For News On Capitol Hill Since 1955

Last updated Sep. 08, 2014

Sorry, you are using an old browser that can't display this interactive. Install the free Google Chrome Frame plug-in for Internet Explorer, or use a modern browser such as Google Chrome, Firefox or a mobile device, such as an iPad, to view this page.

Rep. Janice Hahn (D-Calif.)


Biography
District: 44th District
Political Highlights: candidate for Los Angeles City Council, 1993; Los Angeles Charter Reform Commission, 1997-99; Democratic nominee for U.S. House, 1998; Los Angeles City Council, 2001-11; sought Democratic nomination for lieutenant governor, 2010; U.S. House, 2011-present
Born: March 30, 1952; Los Angeles, Calif.
Residence: Los Angeles
Religion: Church of Christ
Family: Divorced; three children
Education: Pepperdine U., attended 1972-73; Abilene Christian College, B.S. 1974
Military Service: None
Start of Service: Elected: 2011 (1st full term)
Committee Assignments: Small Business (Health and Technology - Ranking Member); Transportation & Infrastructure (Coast Guard & Maritime Transportation; Highways & Transit; Railroads, Pipelines & Hazardous Materials; Water Resources & Environment)

Election History
YearElectionCandidateVotes%
2014generalJanice Hahn (D) 57,50686.7
Adam Shbeita (PFP) 8,79313.3
2012generalJanice Hahn (D) 99,90960.2
Laura Richardson (D) 65,98939.8
1998generalSteven Kuykendall (R) 88,84348.9
Janice Hahn (D) 84,62446.6
Robin Barrett (GREEN) 3,6122.0
Kerry Welsh (LIBERT) 3,0661.7
John Konopka (REF) 1,5610.9
Roll Call Vitals

344th

on the House Seniority List

Fellow California Rep. George Miller (D) is 5th.

1st

California is 1st on Roll Call's Clout Index, which measures influence in Congress by state.

5,838

Twitter Followers (@rep_janicehahn)

Rep. Janice Hahn has no appearances on Sunday talk shows.

Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) has the most appearances so far this year.











Roll Call and CQ Weekly use ratings assigned by the Rothenberg Political Report, which are defined as follows: SAFE: As of today, the party indicated is all but certain to win the seat. FAVORED: One candidate has a substantial advantage, but an upset is still possible. LEAN: The party indicated has the edge, but the outcome is less certain than for races rated as favored. TILT: The outcome is effectively regarded as a tossup for each of these highly competitive seats, although the party indicated has a slight edge. TOSSUP: Neither party has an edge in these contests.