The Source For News On Capitol Hill Since 1955

Last updated Sep. 08, 2014

Sorry, you are using an old browser that can't display this interactive. Install the free Google Chrome Frame plug-in for Internet Explorer, or use a modern browser such as Google Chrome, Firefox or a mobile device, such as an iPad, to view this page.

Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.)

(will retire at end of term)


Biography
Political Highlights: N.M. attorney general, 1979-83; U.S. Senate, 1983-2013
Born: Oct. 3, 1943; El Paso, Texas
Residence: Santa Fe
Religion: Methodist
Family: Wife, Anne Bingaman; one child
Education: Harvard U., A.B. 1965; Stanford U., J.D. 1968
Military Service: Army Reserve, 1968-74
Start of Service: Elected: 1982 (5th term)
Committee Assignments: Energy & Natural Resources; Finance (Energy, Natural Resources & Infrastructure - Chairman; Fiscal Responsibility & Economic Growth; Health Care); Health, Education, Labor & Pensions (Employment & Workplace Safety; Primary Health & Aging); Joint Economic

Election History
YearElectionCandidateVotes%
2006generalJeff Bingaman (D) 394,36570.6
Allen McCulloch (R) 163,82629.3
2000generalJeff Bingaman (D) 363,74461.7
Bill Redmond (R) 225,51738.3
Orlin Cole () 2650.0
1994generalJeff Bingaman (D) 249,98954.0
Colin McMillan (R) 213,02546.0
Francesca Lobato (D) 1300.0
Orlin Cole () 520.0
1988generalJeff Bingaman (D) 321,98363.0
Bill Valentine (R) 186,57937.0
1982generalJeff Bingaman (D) 217,68254.0
Harrison Schmitt (R) 187,12846.0
Roll Call Vitals

2014 Race Rating

(District: NM-B)
 
Safe Democrat


See Also:

(Full Race Ratings Map)

36th

New Mexico is 36th on Roll Call's Clout Index, which measures influence in Congress by state.

Sen. Jeff Bingaman has no appearances on Sunday talk shows.

Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) has the most appearances so far this year.











Roll Call and CQ Weekly use ratings assigned by the Rothenberg Political Report, which are defined as follows: SAFE: As of today, the party indicated is all but certain to win the seat. FAVORED: One candidate has a substantial advantage, but an upset is still possible. LEAN: The party indicated has the edge, but the outcome is less certain than for races rated as favored. TILT: The outcome is effectively regarded as a tossup for each of these highly competitive seats, although the party indicated has a slight edge. TOSSUP: Neither party has an edge in these contests.