The Source For News On Capitol Hill Since 1955

Last updated Sep. 08, 2014

Sorry, you are using an old browser that can't display this interactive. Install the free Google Chrome Frame plug-in for Internet Explorer, or use a modern browser such as Google Chrome, Firefox or a mobile device, such as an iPad, to view this page.

Rep. Ann Marie Buerkle (R-N.Y.)


Biography
District: 25th District
Political Highlights: Republican nominee for Onondaga County Legislature, 1987; Republican nominee for Onondaga County Legislature, 1989; defeated for election to Syracuse Common Council, 1994; Syracuse Common Council, 1994-95
Born: May 8, 1951; Auburn, N.Y.
Residence: Syracuse
Religion: Roman Catholic
Family: Divorced; six children
Education: Le Moyne College, B.S. 1977; Syracuse U., J.D. 1993
Military Service: None
Start of Service: Elected: 2010 (1st term)
Committee Assignments: Foreign Affairs (Africa, Global Health, Global Human Rights & International Organizations; Middle East & North Africa; Terrorism, Nonproliferation & Trade - Vice Chairwoman); Oversight & Government Reform (Economic Growth, Job Creation and Regulatory Affairs - Vice Chairwoman; TARP, Financial Services & Bailouts of Public and Private Programs); Veterans' Affairs (Disability Assistance & Memorial Affairs; Health - Chairwoman)

Defeated by Dan Maffei, D, in a general on Nov. 6, 2012

Election History
YearElectionCandidateVotes%
2012generalDan Maffei (D, WFM) 143,04448.9
Ann Marie Buerkle (R, C, INDC) 127,05443.4
Ursula Rozum (GREEN) 22,6707.7
2010generalAnn Marie Buerkle (R) 104,60250.1
Dan Maffei (D) 103,95449.8
Roll Call Vitals

5th

New York is 5th on Roll Call's Clout Index, which measures influence in Congress by state.

Rep. Ann Marie Buerkle has no appearances on Sunday talk shows.

Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) has the most appearances so far this year.











Roll Call and CQ Weekly use ratings assigned by the Rothenberg Political Report, which are defined as follows: SAFE: As of today, the party indicated is all but certain to win the seat. FAVORED: One candidate has a substantial advantage, but an upset is still possible. LEAN: The party indicated has the edge, but the outcome is less certain than for races rated as favored. TILT: The outcome is effectively regarded as a tossup for each of these highly competitive seats, although the party indicated has a slight edge. TOSSUP: Neither party has an edge in these contests.