The Source For News On Capitol Hill Since 1955

Last updated Sep. 08, 2014

Sorry, you are using an old browser that can't display this interactive. Install the free Google Chrome Frame plug-in for Internet Explorer, or use a modern browser such as Google Chrome, Firefox or a mobile device, such as an iPad, to view this page.

Rep. Jeff Landry (R-La.)


Biography
District: 3rd District
Political Highlights: U.S. House, 2011-13; Republican nominee for La. Senate, 2007
Born: Dec. 23, 1970; St. Martinville, La.
Residence: New Iberia
Religion: Roman Catholic
Family: Wife, Sharon Landry; one child
Education: U. of Southwestern Louisiana, B.S. 1999; Southern U. Law School, attended 2001-03; Loyola U. New Orleans, J.D. 2004
Military Service: La. National Guard, 1987-98
Start of Service: Elected: 2010 (1st term)
Committee Assignments: Natural Resources (Energy & Mineral Resources; Fisheries, Wildlife, Oceans & Insular Affairs); Small Business (Agriculture, Energy & Trade; Contracting & Workforce; Investigations, Oversight & Regulations); Transportation & Infrastructure (Coast Guard & Maritime Transportation - Vice Chairman; Railroads, Pipelines & Hazardous Materials; Water Resources & Environment)

Election History
YearElectionCandidateVotes%
2012generalCharles Boustany (R) 139,12344.7
Jeff Landry (R) 93,52730.0
Ron Richard (D) 67,07021.5
Bryan Barrilleaux (R) 7,9082.5
Jim Stark (LIBERT) 3,7651.2
2010generalJeff Landry (R) 108,96363.8
Ravi Sangisetty (D) 61,91436.2
Roll Call Vitals

4th

Louisiana is 4th on Roll Call's Clout Index, which measures influence in Congress by state.

Rep. Jeff Landry has no appearances on Sunday talk shows.

Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) has the most appearances so far this year.











Roll Call and CQ Weekly use ratings assigned by the Rothenberg Political Report, which are defined as follows: SAFE: As of today, the party indicated is all but certain to win the seat. FAVORED: One candidate has a substantial advantage, but an upset is still possible. LEAN: The party indicated has the edge, but the outcome is less certain than for races rated as favored. TILT: The outcome is effectively regarded as a tossup for each of these highly competitive seats, although the party indicated has a slight edge. TOSSUP: Neither party has an edge in these contests.