The Source For News On Capitol Hill Since 1955

Last updated Sep. 08, 2014

Sorry, you are using an old browser that can't display this interactive. Install the free Google Chrome Frame plug-in for Internet Explorer, or use a modern browser such as Google Chrome, Firefox or a mobile device, such as an iPad, to view this page.

Rep. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.)


Biography
District: At Large
Political Highlights: N.D. Republican Party chairman, 1992-93; Republican nominee for U.S. House, 1996; Republican nominee for U.S. House, 1998; N.D. Public Service Commission, 2003-12; U.S. House, 2013-present
Born: Jan. 21, 1961; Rolette, N.D.
Residence: Bismarck
Religion: Evangelical Christian
Family: Wife, Kris Cramer; five children
Education: Concordia College, B.A. 1983; U. of Mary, M.M 2003
Military Service: None
Start of Service: Elected: 2012 (1st term)
Committee Assignments: Natural Resources (Energy & Mineral Resources; Indian & Alaska Native Affairs; Public Lands and Environmental Regulation); Science, Space & Technology (Energy; Oversight)

Election History
YearElectionCandidateVotes%
2012generalKevin Cramer (R) 173,58554.9
Pam Gulleson (D) 131,87041.7
Eric Olson (LIBERT) 10,2163.2
1998generalEarl Pomeroy (D) 119,66856.2
Kevin Cramer (R) 87,51141.1
Kenneth Loughead (I) 5,7092.7
1996generalEarl Pomeroy (D) 144,83355.1
Kevin Cramer (R) 113,68443.2
Kenneth Loughead (I) 4,4931.7
Roll Call Vitals

2014 Race Rating

(District: ND-AL)
 
Safe Republican


See Also:

(Full Race Ratings Map)

371st

on the House Seniority List

.

28th

North Dakota is 28th on Roll Call's Clout Index, which measures influence in Congress by state.

3,153

Twitter Followers (@RepKevinCramer)

Rep. Kevin Cramer has no appearances on Sunday talk shows.

Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) has the most appearances so far this year.











Roll Call and CQ Weekly use ratings assigned by the Rothenberg Political Report, which are defined as follows: SAFE: As of today, the party indicated is all but certain to win the seat. FAVORED: One candidate has a substantial advantage, but an upset is still possible. LEAN: The party indicated has the edge, but the outcome is less certain than for races rated as favored. TILT: The outcome is effectively regarded as a tossup for each of these highly competitive seats, although the party indicated has a slight edge. TOSSUP: Neither party has an edge in these contests.