Last updated Sep. 08, 2014

Sorry, you are using an old browser that can't display this interactive. Install the free Google Chrome Frame plug-in for Internet Explorer, or use a modern browser such as Google Chrome, Firefox or a mobile device, such as an iPad, to view this page.

Scott Brown (R-N.H.)


Biography
Political Highlights: Wrentham Board of Assessors, 1987-89; Wrentham Board of Selectmen, 1996-99; Mass. House, 1999-2004; Mass. Senate, 2004-10; U.S. Senate, 2010-13
Born: Sept. 12, 1959; Kittery, Maine
Residence:
Religion: Protestant
Family: Wife, Gail Huff; two children
Education: Tufts U., B.A. 1981; Boston College, J.D. 1985
Military Service: Mass. National Guard, 1979-2012; Md. National Guard, 2012-present
Start of Service: Elected: 2010 (1st term)
Committee Assignments: Armed Services (Airland - Ranking Member; Emerging Threats & Capabilities; Personnel); Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs (Emergency Management & District of Columbia; Federal Financial Management - Ranking Member; Permanent Investigations); Small Business & Entrepreneurship; Veterans' Affairs

Defeated by Elizabeth Warren, D, in a general on Nov. 6, 2012

Election History
YearElectionCandidateVotes%
2012generalElizabeth Warren (D) 1,696,34653.7
Scott Brown (R) 1,458,04846.2
Roll Call Vitals

2014 Race Rating

(District: NH-A)
 
Leans Democratic


See Also:

(Full Race Ratings Map)

50th

New Hampshire is 50th on Roll Call's Clout Index, which measures influence in Congress by state.

112,347

Twitter Followers (@senwarren)

Scott Brown has no appearances on Sunday talk shows.

Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) has the most appearances so far this year.











Roll Call and CQ Weekly use ratings assigned by the Rothenberg Political Report, which are defined as follows: SAFE: As of today, the party indicated is all but certain to win the seat. FAVORED: One candidate has a substantial advantage, but an upset is still possible. LEAN: The party indicated has the edge, but the outcome is less certain than for races rated as favored. TILT: The outcome is effectively regarded as a tossup for each of these highly competitive seats, although the party indicated has a slight edge. TOSSUP: Neither party has an edge in these contests.