The Source For News On Capitol Hill Since 1955

Last updated Sep. 08, 2014

Sorry, you are using an old browser that can't display this interactive. Install the free Google Chrome Frame plug-in for Internet Explorer, or use a modern browser such as Google Chrome, Firefox or a mobile device, such as an iPad, to view this page.

Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.)


Biography
District: 4th District
Political Highlights: Housing Authority of the Town of Greenwich, 2003-06; Greenwich Democratic Town Committee chairman, 2004-08; Greenwich Board of Estimate and Taxation, 2006-07; U.S. House, 2009-present
Born: July 5, 1966; Lima, Peru
Residence: Greenwich
Religion: Presbyterian
Family: Wife, Mary Himes; two children
Education: Harvard U., A.B. 1988; Oxford U., M.Phil. 1990
Military Service: None
Start of Service: Elected: 2008 (3rd term)
Committee Assignments: Financial Services (Capital Markets & Government Sponsored Enterprises; Monetary Policy & Trade); Select Intelligence (Oversight & Investigations; Terrorism, Human Intelligence, Analysis & Counterintelligence)

Election History
YearElectionCandidateVotes%
2014generalJim Himes (D) 106,87353.8
Dan Debicella (R) 91,92246.2
2012generalJim Himes (D) 175,92960.0
Steve Obsitnik (R) 117,50340.0
2010generalJim Himes (D) 115,35153.1
Dan Debicella (R) 102,03046.9
2008generalJim Himes (D) 158,47551.3
Christopher Shays (R) 146,85447.6
Michael Carrano (LIBERT) 2,0490.7
Richard Duffee (GREEN) 1,3880.5
Roll Call Vitals

239th

on the House Seniority List

Fellow Connecticut Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D) is 38th.

31st

Connecticut is 31st on Roll Call's Clout Index, which measures influence in Congress by state.

15,412

Twitter Followers (@jahimes)

Rep. Jim Himes has no appearances on Sunday talk shows.

Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) has the most appearances so far this year.











Roll Call and CQ Weekly use ratings assigned by the Rothenberg Political Report, which are defined as follows: SAFE: As of today, the party indicated is all but certain to win the seat. FAVORED: One candidate has a substantial advantage, but an upset is still possible. LEAN: The party indicated has the edge, but the outcome is less certain than for races rated as favored. TILT: The outcome is effectively regarded as a tossup for each of these highly competitive seats, although the party indicated has a slight edge. TOSSUP: Neither party has an edge in these contests.