The Source For News On Capitol Hill Since 1955

Last updated Sep. 08, 2014

Sorry, you are using an old browser that can't display this interactive. Install the free Google Chrome Frame plug-in for Internet Explorer, or use a modern browser such as Google Chrome, Firefox or a mobile device, such as an iPad, to view this page.

Rep. Mark Schauer (D-Mich.)


Biography
District: 7th District
Political Highlights: candidate for Battle Creek City Commission, 1993; Battle Creek City Commission, 1994-97; Mich. House, 1997-2003; Mich. Senate, 2003-09; U.S. House, 2009-11
Born: Oct. 2, 1961; Howell, Mich.
Residence: Battle Creek
Religion: Methodist
Family: Wife, Christine Schauer; three stepchildren
Education: Albion College, B.A. 1984; Western Michigan U., M.P.A. 1986; Michigan State U., M.A. 1996
Military Service: None
Start of Service: Elected: 2008 (1st term)
Committee Assignments: Agriculture (Conservation, Credit, Energy & Research); Transportation & Infrastructure (Aviation; Highways & Transit - Vice Chairman; Railroads, Pipelines & Hazardous Materials)

Defeated by Tim Walberg, R, in general election on November 2, 2010

Election History
YearElectionCandidateVotes%
2010generalTim Walberg (R) 113,18550.2
Mark Schauer (D) 102,40245.4
Scott Aughney (USTAX) 3,7051.6
Greg Merle (LIBERT) 3,2391.4
Richard Wunsch (GREEN) 3,1171.4
2008generalMark Schauer (D) 157,21348.8
Tim Walberg (R) 149,78146.5
Lynn Meadows (GREEN) 9,5283.0
Ken Proctor (LIBERT) 5,6751.8
Roll Call Vitals

2014 Race Rating

(District: MI-07)
 
Favored Republican


See Also:

(Full Race Ratings Map)

7th

Michigan is 7th on Roll Call's Clout Index, which measures influence in Congress by state.

Rep. Mark Schauer has no appearances on Sunday talk shows.

Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) has the most appearances so far this year.











Roll Call and CQ Weekly use ratings assigned by the Rothenberg Political Report, which are defined as follows: SAFE: As of today, the party indicated is all but certain to win the seat. FAVORED: One candidate has a substantial advantage, but an upset is still possible. LEAN: The party indicated has the edge, but the outcome is less certain than for races rated as favored. TILT: The outcome is effectively regarded as a tossup for each of these highly competitive seats, although the party indicated has a slight edge. TOSSUP: Neither party has an edge in these contests.