Last updated Sep. 08, 2014

Sorry, you are using an old browser that can't display this interactive. Install the free Google Chrome Frame plug-in for Internet Explorer, or use a modern browser such as Google Chrome, Firefox or a mobile device, such as an iPad, to view this page.

Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.)

(will retire at end of term)


Biography
Political Highlights: U.S. House, 1987-95; U.S. Senate, 1995-2013
Born: April 25, 1942; Oakland, Neb.
Residence: Phoenix
Religion: Presbyterian
Family: Wife, Caryll Kyl; two children
Education: U. of Arizona, B.A. 1964; U. of Arizona, LL.B. 1966
Military Service: None
Start of Service: Elected: 1994 (3rd term)
Committee Assignments: Finance (Health Care; Social Security, Pensions & Family Policy; Taxation & IRS Oversight - Ranking Member); Judiciary (Constitution, Civil Rights & Human Rights; Crime & Terrorism - Ranking Member; Immigration, Refugees & Border Security)

Election History
YearElectionCandidateVotes%
2006generalJon Kyl (R) 814,39853.3
Jim Pederson (D) 664,14143.5
Richard Mack (LIBERT) 48,2313.2
2000generalJon Kyl (R) 1,108,19679.3
William Toel (I) 109,2307.8
Vance Hansen (GREEN) 108,9267.8
Barry Hess (LIBERT) 70,7245.1
1994generalJon Kyl (R) 600,99953.7
Sam Coppersmith (D) 442,51039.5
Scott Grainger (LIBERT) 75,4936.7
Mark Pope () 580.0
1992generalJon Kyl (R) 156,33059.2
Walter Mybeck (D) 70,57226.7
Debbie Collings (I) 25,5539.7
Tim McDermott (LIBERT) 11,6114.4
1990generalJon Kyl (R) 141,84361.0
Mark Ivey (D) 89,39539.0
1988generalJon Kyl (R) 206,24887.0
Gary Sprunk (LIBERT) 30,43013.0
1986generalJon Kyl (R) 121,93965.0
Philip Davis (D) 66,89435.0
Roll Call Vitals

2014 Race Rating

(District: AZ-B)
 
No race


See Also:

(Full Race Ratings Map)

33rd

Arizona is 33rd on Roll Call's Clout Index, which measures influence in Congress by state.

12,578

Twitter Followers (@SenJonKyl)

Sen. Jon Kyl has no appearances on Sunday talk shows.

Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) has the most appearances so far this year.











Roll Call and CQ Weekly use ratings assigned by the Rothenberg Political Report, which are defined as follows: SAFE: As of today, the party indicated is all but certain to win the seat. FAVORED: One candidate has a substantial advantage, but an upset is still possible. LEAN: The party indicated has the edge, but the outcome is less certain than for races rated as favored. TILT: The outcome is effectively regarded as a tossup for each of these highly competitive seats, although the party indicated has a slight edge. TOSSUP: Neither party has an edge in these contests.