The Source For News On Capitol Hill Since 1955

Last updated Sep. 08, 2014

Sorry, you are using an old browser that can't display this interactive. Install the free Google Chrome Frame plug-in for Internet Explorer, or use a modern browser such as Google Chrome, Firefox or a mobile device, such as an iPad, to view this page.

Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.)


Biography
Political Highlights: no previous office, ; U.S. Senate, 2009-present
Born: May 21, 1951; Manhattan, N.Y.
Residence: Minneapolis
Religion: Jewish
Family: Wife, Franni Franken; two children
Education: Harvard U., A.B. 1973
Military Service: None
Start of Service: Elected: 2008 (1st term)
Committee Assignments: Energy & Natural Resources (Energy - Chairman; Public Lands, Forests and Mining; Water & Power); Health, Education, Labor & Pensions (Children & Families; Employment & Workplace Safety); Indian Affairs; Judiciary (Antitrust, Competition Policy & Consumer Rights; Bankruptcy & Courts; Constitution, Civil Rights & Human Rights; Privacy, Technology & the Law - Chairman)

Election History
YearElectionCandidateVotes%
2014generalAl Franken (D) 1,053,20553.2
Mike McFadden (R) 850,22742.9
Steve Carlson (INDC) 47,5302.4
Heather Johnson (LIBERT) 29,6851.5
2008generalJames Niemackl (CNSTP) 00.0
Dean Barkley (INDC) 00.0
Charles Aldrich (LIBERT) 00.0
Al Franken (D) 1,212,62941.5
Norm Coleman (R) 1,212,31741.5
Roll Call Vitals

35th

Minnesota is 35th on Roll Call's Clout Index, which measures influence in Congress by state.

190,592

Twitter Followers (@alfranken)

45th

Sen. Al Franken has the 45th most Sunday talk show appearances amongst members of Congress.


Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) has the most appearances so far this year.











Roll Call and CQ Weekly use ratings assigned by the Rothenberg Political Report, which are defined as follows: SAFE: As of today, the party indicated is all but certain to win the seat. FAVORED: One candidate has a substantial advantage, but an upset is still possible. LEAN: The party indicated has the edge, but the outcome is less certain than for races rated as favored. TILT: The outcome is effectively regarded as a tossup for each of these highly competitive seats, although the party indicated has a slight edge. TOSSUP: Neither party has an edge in these contests.