The Source For News On Capitol Hill Since 1955

Last updated Sep. 08, 2014

Sorry, you are using an old browser that can't display this interactive. Install the free Google Chrome Frame plug-in for Internet Explorer, or use a modern browser such as Google Chrome, Firefox or a mobile device, such as an iPad, to view this page.

Rep. Carol Shea-Porter (D-N.H.)


Biography
District: 1st District
Political Highlights: U.S. House, 2007-11; defeated for re-election to U.S. House, 2010; U.S. House, 2013-15
Born: Dec., 1952; Brooklyn, N.Y.
Residence: Rochester
Religion: Roman Catholic
Family: Husband, Gene Porter; two children
Education: U. of New Hampshire, B.A. 1975; U. of New Hampshire, M.P.A. 1979
Military Service: None
Start of Service: Elected: 2006 (3rd term)
Committee Assignments: Armed Services (Military Personnel; Readiness); Natural Resources (Fisheries, Wildlife, Oceans & Insular Affairs; Public Lands and Environmental Regulation)

Election History
YearElectionCandidateVotes%
2014generalFrank Guinta (R) 111,35151.3
Carol Shea-Porter (D) 105,62248.7
2012generalCarol Shea-Porter (D) 171,65049.8
Frank Guinta (R) 158,65946.0
B. Kelly (LIBERT) 14,5214.2
2010generalFrank Guinta (R) 121,65554.0
Carol Shea-Porter (D) 95,50342.4
Philip Hodson (LIBERT) 7,9663.5
2008generalCarol Shea-Porter (D) 176,43551.7
Jeb Bradley (R) 156,33845.8
Robert Kingsbury (LIBERT) 8,1002.4
2006generalCarol Shea-Porter (D) 100,69151.3
Jeb Bradley (R) 95,52748.6
Roll Call Vitals

268th

on the House Seniority List

Fellow New Hampshire Rep. Ann McLane Kuster (D) is 393rd.

50th

New Hampshire is 50th on Roll Call's Clout Index, which measures influence in Congress by state.

Rep. Carol Shea-Porter has no appearances on Sunday talk shows.

Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) has the most appearances so far this year.











Roll Call and CQ Weekly use ratings assigned by the Rothenberg Political Report, which are defined as follows: SAFE: As of today, the party indicated is all but certain to win the seat. FAVORED: One candidate has a substantial advantage, but an upset is still possible. LEAN: The party indicated has the edge, but the outcome is less certain than for races rated as favored. TILT: The outcome is effectively regarded as a tossup for each of these highly competitive seats, although the party indicated has a slight edge. TOSSUP: Neither party has an edge in these contests.