The Source For News On Capitol Hill Since 1955

Last updated Sep. 08, 2014

Sorry, you are using an old browser that can't display this interactive. Install the free Google Chrome Frame plug-in for Internet Explorer, or use a modern browser such as Google Chrome, Firefox or a mobile device, such as an iPad, to view this page.

Rep. John Shadegg (R-Ariz.)

District: 3rd District
Political Highlights: no previous office, ; U.S. House of Representatives, 1995-2011
Born: Oct. 22, 1949; Phoenix, Ariz.
Residence: Phoenix
Religion: Episcopalian
Family: Wife, Shirley Shadegg; two children
Education: U. of Arizona, B.A. 1972; U. of Arizona, J.D. 1975
Military Service: Ariz. Air National Guard, 1969-75
Start of Service: Elected: 1994 (8th term)
Committee Assignments: Energy & Commerce (Communications & Technology; Energy & Power; Health); Select Energy Independence & Global Warming

Election History
2008generalJohn Shadegg (R) 148,80054.1
Bob Lord (D) 115,75942.1
Michael Shoen (LIBERT) 10,6023.9
2006generalJohn Shadegg (R) 112,51959.3
Herb Paine (D) 72,58638.2
Mark Yannone (LIBERT) 4,7442.5
2004generalJohn Shadegg (R) 181,01280.1
Mark Yannone (LIBERT) 44,96219.9
2002generalJohn Shadegg (R) 104,84767.3
Charles Hill (D) 47,17330.3
Mark Yannone (LIBERT) 3,7312.4
2000generalJohn Shadegg (R) 140,39664.0
Ben Jankowski (D) 71,80332.7
Ernest Hancock (LIBERT) 7,2983.3
1998generalJohn Shadegg (R) 102,72264.7
Eric Ehst (D) 49,53831.2
Ernest Hancock (LIBERT) 3,8052.4
Doug Quelland (I) 2,7571.7
1996generalJohn Shadegg (R) 150,48666.8
Maria Milton (D) 74,85733.2
1994generalJohn Shadegg (R) 116,71460.2
Carol Cure (D) 69,76036.0
Mark Yannone (LIBERT) 7,4283.8
Roll Call Vitals


Arizona is 33rd on Roll Call's Clout Index, which measures influence in Congress by state.

Rep. John Shadegg has no appearances on Sunday talk shows.

Sen. Bernard Sanders (I-Vt.) has the most appearances so far this year.

Roll Call and CQ Weekly use ratings assigned by the Rothenberg Political Report, which are defined as follows: SAFE: As of today, the party indicated is all but certain to win the seat. FAVORED: One candidate has a substantial advantage, but an upset is still possible. LEAN: The party indicated has the edge, but the outcome is less certain than for races rated as favored. TILT: The outcome is effectively regarded as a tossup for each of these highly competitive seats, although the party indicated has a slight edge. TOSSUP: Neither party has an edge in these contests.