The Source For News On Capitol Hill Since 1955

Last updated Sep. 08, 2014

Sorry, you are using an old browser that can't display this interactive. Install the free Google Chrome Frame plug-in for Internet Explorer, or use a modern browser such as Google Chrome, Firefox or a mobile device, such as an iPad, to view this page.

Rep. Bill Delahunt (D-Mass.)

District: 10th District
Political Highlights: Quincy City Council, 1971-73; Mass. House, 1973-75; Norfolk County district attorney, 1975-97; U.S. House, 1997-2011
Born: July 18, 1941; Quincy, Mass.
Residence: Quincy
Religion: Roman Catholic
Family: Divorced; two children
Education: Middlebury College, B.A. 1963; Boston College, J.D. 1967
Military Service: Coast Guard, 1963; Coast Guard Reserve, 1963-71
Start of Service: Elected: 1996 (7th term)
Committee Assignments: Foreign Affairs (Europe - Chairman; International Organizations, Human Rights & Oversight); Judiciary (Commercial & Administrative Law - Vice Chairman; Constitution, Civil Rights & Civil Liberties; Task Force on Judicial Impeachment)

Election History
2008generalBill Delahunt (D) 272,89998.6
2006generalBill Delahunt (D) 171,81264.3
Jeffrey Beatty (R) 78,43929.4
Peter White (I) 16,8086.3
2004generalBill Delahunt (D) 222,01365.9
Michael Jones (R) 114,87934.1
2002generalBill Delahunt (D) 179,23869.2
Luiz Gonzaga (R) 79,62430.7
2000generalBill Delahunt (D) 234,67574.1
Eric Bleicken (R) 81,19225.7
1998generalBill Delahunt (D) 164,91770.0
Eric Bleicken (R) 70,46629.9
1996generalBill Delahunt (D) 160,74554.3
Edward Teague (R) 123,52041.7
A. Laws (GREEN) 10,9133.7
Roll Call Vitals


Massachusetts is 20th on Roll Call's Clout Index, which measures influence in Congress by state.

Rep. Bill Delahunt has no appearances on Sunday talk shows.

Sen. Bernard Sanders (I-Vt.) has the most appearances so far this year.

Roll Call and CQ Weekly use ratings assigned by the Rothenberg Political Report, which are defined as follows: SAFE: As of today, the party indicated is all but certain to win the seat. FAVORED: One candidate has a substantial advantage, but an upset is still possible. LEAN: The party indicated has the edge, but the outcome is less certain than for races rated as favored. TILT: The outcome is effectively regarded as a tossup for each of these highly competitive seats, although the party indicated has a slight edge. TOSSUP: Neither party has an edge in these contests.