The Source For News On Capitol Hill Since 1955

Last updated Sep. 08, 2014

Sorry, you are using an old browser that can't display this interactive. Install the free Google Chrome Frame plug-in for Internet Explorer, or use a modern browser such as Google Chrome, Firefox or a mobile device, such as an iPad, to view this page.

Rep. Yvette D. Clarke (D-N.Y.)


Biography
District: 9th District
Political Highlights: New York City Council, 2002-07; sought Democratic nomination for U.S. House, 2004; U.S. House, 2007-present
Born: Nov. 21, 1964; Brooklyn, N.Y.
Residence: Brooklyn
Religion: Christian
Family: Single
Education: Oberlin College, attended 1982-86
Military Service: None
Start of Service: Elected: 2006 (4th term)
Committee Assignments: Ethics; Homeland Security (Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection & Security Technologies - Ranking Member; Emergency Preparedness, Response & Communications); Small Business (Contracting & Workforce; Investigations, Oversight & Regulations - Ranking Member)

Election History
YearElectionCandidateVotes%
2012generalYvette Clarke (D, WFM) 186,14187.3
Daniel Cavanagh (R, C) 24,16411.3
Vivia Morgan (GREEN) 2,9911.4
2010generalYvette Clarke (D) 104,29790.5
Hugh Carr (R) 10,8589.4
2008generalYvette Clarke (D, WFM) 168,56292.8
Hugh Carr (R) 11,6446.4
Cartrell Gore (C) 1,5170.8
2006generalYvette Clarke (D, WFM) 88,33490.0
Stephen Finger (R, LIBERT) 7,4477.6
Mariana Blume (C) 1,3251.4
Ollie McClean (FDM) 9961.0
Roll Call Vitals

2014 Race Rating

(District: NY-09)
 
Safe Democrat


See Also:

(Full Race Ratings Map)

203rd

on the House Seniority List

Fellow New York Rep. Charles B. Rangel (D) is 3rd.

5th

New York is 5th on Roll Call's Clout Index, which measures influence in Congress by state.

8,776

Twitter Followers (@YvetteClarke)

Rep. Yvette D. Clarke has no appearances on Sunday talk shows.

Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) has the most appearances so far this year.











Roll Call and CQ Weekly use ratings assigned by the Rothenberg Political Report, which are defined as follows: SAFE: As of today, the party indicated is all but certain to win the seat. FAVORED: One candidate has a substantial advantage, but an upset is still possible. LEAN: The party indicated has the edge, but the outcome is less certain than for races rated as favored. TILT: The outcome is effectively regarded as a tossup for each of these highly competitive seats, although the party indicated has a slight edge. TOSSUP: Neither party has an edge in these contests.