The Source For News On Capitol Hill Since 1955

Last updated Sep. 08, 2014

Sorry, you are using an old browser that can't display this interactive. Install the free Google Chrome Frame plug-in for Internet Explorer, or use a modern browser such as Google Chrome, Firefox or a mobile device, such as an iPad, to view this page.

Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.)


Biography
District: 2nd District
Political Highlights: sought Democratic nomination for U.S. House, 1994; U.S. House, 1997-present
Born: Nov. 20, 1959; Worcester, Mass.
Residence: Worcester
Religion: Roman Catholic
Family: Wife, Lisa McGovern; two children
Education: American U., B.A. 1981; American U., M.P.A. 1984
Military Service: None
Start of Service: Elected: 1996 (9th term)
Committee Assignments: Agriculture (Department Operations, Oversight & Nutrition); Rules (Rules & the Organization of the House - Ranking Member)

Election History
YearElectionCandidateVotes%
2012generalJim McGovern (D) 259,25798.5
2010generalJim McGovern (D) 122,70856.5
Marty Lamb (R) 85,12439.2
Patrick Barron (I) 9,3884.3
2008generalJim McGovern (D) 227,61998.5
2006generalJim McGovern (D) 166,97398.8
2004generalJim McGovern (D) 192,03670.5
Ronald Crews (R) 80,19729.4
2002generalJim McGovern (D) 155,69798.8
2000generalJim McGovern (D) 213,06598.8
1998generalJim McGovern (D) 108,61356.9
Matthew Amorello (R) 79,17441.5
George Phillies (LIBERT) 2,8871.5
1996generalJim McGovern (D) 135,04452.9
Peter Blute (R) 115,69445.4
Dale Friedgen (NL) 3,3621.3
Roll Call Vitals

2014 Race Rating

(District: MA-02)
 
Safe Democrat


See Also:

(Full Race Ratings Map)

93rd

on the House Seniority List

Fellow Massachusetts Rep. Richard E. Neal (D) is 31st.

20th

Massachusetts is 20th on Roll Call's Clout Index, which measures influence in Congress by state.

11,439

Twitter Followers (@repmcgovern)

Rep. Jim McGovern has no appearances on Sunday talk shows.

Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) has the most appearances so far this year.











Roll Call and CQ Weekly use ratings assigned by the Rothenberg Political Report, which are defined as follows: SAFE: As of today, the party indicated is all but certain to win the seat. FAVORED: One candidate has a substantial advantage, but an upset is still possible. LEAN: The party indicated has the edge, but the outcome is less certain than for races rated as favored. TILT: The outcome is effectively regarded as a tossup for each of these highly competitive seats, although the party indicated has a slight edge. TOSSUP: Neither party has an edge in these contests.