The Source For News On Capitol Hill Since 1955

Last updated Sep. 08, 2014

Sorry, you are using an old browser that can't display this interactive. Install the free Google Chrome Frame plug-in for Internet Explorer, or use a modern browser such as Google Chrome, Firefox or a mobile device, such as an iPad, to view this page.

Rep. Al Green (D-Texas)


Biography
District: 9th District
Political Highlights: Harris County Justice of the Peace Court judge, 1977-2004; candidate for mayor of Houston, 1981; U.S. House, 2005-present
Born: Sept. 1, 1947; New Orleans, La.
Residence: Houston
Religion: Baptist
Family: Divorced
Education: Florida A&M U., attended 1966-71; Tuskegee Institute of Technology, attended ; Texas Southern U., J.D. 1973
Military Service: None
Start of Service: Elected: 2004 (5th term)
Committee Assignments: Financial Services (Financial Institutions & Consumer Credit; Oversight & Investigations - Ranking Member)

Election History
YearElectionCandidateVotes%
2012generalAl Green (D) 144,07578.5
Steve Mueller (R) 36,13919.7
Vanessa Foster (GREEN) 1,7431.0
John Wieder (LIBERT) 1,6090.9
2010generalAl Green (D) 80,10775.7
Steve Mueller (R) 24,20122.9
Michael Hope (LIBERT) 1,4591.4
2008generalAl Green (D) 143,86893.6
Brad Walters (LIBERT) 9,7606.4
2006generalAl Green (D) 60,253100.0
2004generalAl Green (D) 114,46272.2
Arlette Molina (R) 42,13226.6
Stacey Bourland (LIBERT) 1,9721.2
Roll Call Vitals

2014 Race Rating

(District: TX-09)
 
Safe Democrat


See Also:

(Full Race Ratings Map)

180th

on the House Seniority List

Fellow Texas Rep. Ralph M. Hall (R) is 10th.

3rd

Texas is 3rd on Roll Call's Clout Index, which measures influence in Congress by state.

7,014

Twitter Followers (@RepAlGreen)

Rep. Al Green has no appearances on Sunday talk shows.

Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) has the most appearances so far this year.











Roll Call and CQ Weekly use ratings assigned by the Rothenberg Political Report, which are defined as follows: SAFE: As of today, the party indicated is all but certain to win the seat. FAVORED: One candidate has a substantial advantage, but an upset is still possible. LEAN: The party indicated has the edge, but the outcome is less certain than for races rated as favored. TILT: The outcome is effectively regarded as a tossup for each of these highly competitive seats, although the party indicated has a slight edge. TOSSUP: Neither party has an edge in these contests.