The Source For News On Capitol Hill Since 1955

Last updated Sep. 08, 2014

Sorry, you are using an old browser that can't display this interactive. Install the free Google Chrome Frame plug-in for Internet Explorer, or use a modern browser such as Google Chrome, Firefox or a mobile device, such as an iPad, to view this page.

Rep. Ben Chandler (D-Ky.)


Biography
District: 6th District
Political Highlights: Ky. auditor, 1992-96; Ky. attorney general, 1996-2004; Democratic nominee for governor, 2003
Born: Sept. 12, 1959; Versailles, Ky.
Residence: Versailles
Religion: Presbyterian
Family: Wife, Jennifer Chandler; three children
Education: U. of Kentucky, B.A. 1983; U. of Kentucky, J.D. 1986
Military Service: None
Start of Service: Elected: 2004 (4th full term)
Committee Assignments: Foreign Affairs (Middle East & North Africa); Select Intelligence (Technical & Tactical Intelligence)

Election History
YearElectionCandidateVotes%
2012generalAndy Barr (R) 153,22250.6
Ben Chandler (D) 141,43846.7
Randolph Vance (I) 8,3402.8
2010generalBen Chandler (D) 119,81250.1
Andy Barr (R) 119,16549.8
2008generalBen Chandler (D) 203,76464.7
Jon Larson (R) 111,37835.3
2006generalBen Chandler (D) 158,76585.5
Paul Ard (LIBERT) 27,01514.5
2004generalBen Chandler (D) 175,35558.6
Tom Buford (R) 119,71640.0
Stacy Abner (CNSTP) 2,3880.8
Mark Gailey (LIBERT) 1,7580.6
2003generalErnie Fletcher (R) 596,28455.0
Ben Chandler (D) 487,15945.0
Roll Call Vitals

22nd

Kentucky is 22nd on Roll Call's Clout Index, which measures influence in Congress by state.

Rep. Ben Chandler has no appearances on Sunday talk shows.

Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) has the most appearances so far this year.











Roll Call and CQ Weekly use ratings assigned by the Rothenberg Political Report, which are defined as follows: SAFE: As of today, the party indicated is all but certain to win the seat. FAVORED: One candidate has a substantial advantage, but an upset is still possible. LEAN: The party indicated has the edge, but the outcome is less certain than for races rated as favored. TILT: The outcome is effectively regarded as a tossup for each of these highly competitive seats, although the party indicated has a slight edge. TOSSUP: Neither party has an edge in these contests.