The Source For News On Capitol Hill Since 1955

Last updated Sep. 08, 2014

Sorry, you are using an old browser that can't display this interactive. Install the free Google Chrome Frame plug-in for Internet Explorer, or use a modern browser such as Google Chrome, Firefox or a mobile device, such as an iPad, to view this page.

Sen. Roland W. Burris (D-Ill.)

(Resigned)


Biography
Political Highlights: sought Democratic nomination for Ill. House, 1968; Department of General Services director, 1973-77; sought Democratic nomination for Ill. comptroller, 1976; Ill. comptroller, 1979-91; sought Democratic nomination for U.S. Senate, 1984; Ill. attorney general, 1991-95; sought Democratic nomination for governor, 1994; independent candidate for mayor of Chicago, 1995; sought Democratic nomination for governor, 1998; sought Democratic nomination for governor, 2002; U.S. Senate, 2009-10
Born: Aug. 3, 1937; Centralia, Ill.
Residence: Chicago
Religion: Baptist
Family: Wife, Berlean M. Burris; two children
Education: Southern Illinois U., Carbondale, B.A. 1959; Howard U., LL.B. 1963
Military Service: None
Start of Service: Appointed: 2009 (1st term)
End of Service: Nov. 29, 2010
Committee Assignments: Armed Services (Airland; Personnel; Readiness & Management Support); Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs (Efficiency of Federal Programs; Emergency Management & District of Columbia; Federal Financial Management); Veterans' Affairs

Election History
YearElectionCandidateVotes%
Roll Call Vitals

16th

Illinois is 16th on Roll Call's Clout Index, which measures influence in Congress by state.

Sen. Roland W. Burris has no appearances on Sunday talk shows.

Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) has the most appearances so far this year.











Roll Call and CQ Weekly use ratings assigned by the Rothenberg Political Report, which are defined as follows: SAFE: As of today, the party indicated is all but certain to win the seat. FAVORED: One candidate has a substantial advantage, but an upset is still possible. LEAN: The party indicated has the edge, but the outcome is less certain than for races rated as favored. TILT: The outcome is effectively regarded as a tossup for each of these highly competitive seats, although the party indicated has a slight edge. TOSSUP: Neither party has an edge in these contests.