The Source For News On Capitol Hill Since 1955

Last updated Sep. 08, 2014

Sorry, you are using an old browser that can't display this interactive. Install the free Google Chrome Frame plug-in for Internet Explorer, or use a modern browser such as Google Chrome, Firefox or a mobile device, such as an iPad, to view this page.

Rep. Brad Miller (D-N.C.)


Biography
District: 13th District
Political Highlights: Wake County Democratic Party chairman, 1985-87; sought Democratic nomination for N.C. secretary of state, 1988; N.C. House, 1993-94; defeated for re-election to N.C. House, 1994; N.C. Senate, 1997-2002; U.S. House, 2003-13
Born: May 19, 1953; Fayetteville, N.C.
Residence: Raleigh
Religion: Episcopalian
Family: Divorced
Education: U. of North Carolina, B.A. 1975; London School of Economics, M.S.C. 1978; Columbia U., J.D. 1979
Military Service: None
Start of Service: Elected: 2002 (5th term)
Committee Assignments: Financial Services (Capital Markets & Government Sponsored Enterprises; Financial Institutions & Consumer Credit; Oversight & Investigations); Science, Space & Technology (Energy & Environment - Ranking Member; Investigations & Oversight)

Election History
YearElectionCandidateVotes%
2010generalBrad Miller (D) 116,10355.5
William Randall (R) 93,09944.5
2008generalBrad Miller (D) 221,37965.9
Hugh Webster (R) 114,38334.1
2006generalBrad Miller (D) 98,54063.7
Vernon Robinson (R) 56,12036.3
2004generalBrad Miller (D) 160,89658.8
Virginia Johnson (R) 112,78841.2
2002generalBrad Miller (D) 100,28754.7
Carolyn Grant (R) 77,68842.4
Alex MacDonald (LIBERT) 5,2952.9
Roll Call Vitals

13th

North Carolina is 13th on Roll Call's Clout Index, which measures influence in Congress by state.

2,443

Twitter Followers (@RepBradMiller)

Rep. Brad Miller has no appearances on Sunday talk shows.

Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) has the most appearances so far this year.











Roll Call and CQ Weekly use ratings assigned by the Rothenberg Political Report, which are defined as follows: SAFE: As of today, the party indicated is all but certain to win the seat. FAVORED: One candidate has a substantial advantage, but an upset is still possible. LEAN: The party indicated has the edge, but the outcome is less certain than for races rated as favored. TILT: The outcome is effectively regarded as a tossup for each of these highly competitive seats, although the party indicated has a slight edge. TOSSUP: Neither party has an edge in these contests.