The Source For News On Capitol Hill Since 1955

Last updated Sep. 08, 2014

Sorry, you are using an old browser that can't display this interactive. Install the free Google Chrome Frame plug-in for Internet Explorer, or use a modern browser such as Google Chrome, Firefox or a mobile device, such as an iPad, to view this page.

Rep. Steve Stockman (R-Texas)


Biography
District: 36th District
Political Highlights: sought Republican nomination for U.S. House, 1990; Republican nominee for U.S. House, 1992; U.S. House, 1995-97; defeated for re-election to U.S. House, 1996; sought Republican nomination for Texas Railroad Commission, 1998; candidate for U.S. House (special election), 2006; sought Republican nomination for U.S. Senate, 2014; U.S. House, 2013-15
Born: Nov. 14, 1956; Bloomfield Hills, Mich.
Residence: Friendswood
Religion: Baptist
Family: Wife, Patti Ferguson
Education: San. Jacinto College, attended 1985-86; U. of Houston, Clear Lake, B.S. 1990
Military Service: None
Start of Service: Elected: 2012 (2nd term)
Committee Assignments: Foreign Affairs (Africa, Global Health, Global Human Rights & International Organizations; Europe, Eurasia & Emerging Threats); Science, Space & Technology (Research and Technology; Space)

Election History
YearElectionCandidateVotes%
2012generalSteve Stockman (R) 165,40570.7
Max Martin (D) 62,14326.6
Michael Cole (LIBERT) 6,2842.7
1996generalSteve Stockman (R) 88,17146.4
Nick Lampson (D) 83,78244.1
Geraldine Sam (D) 17,8879.4
Roll Call Vitals

354th

on the House Seniority List

Fellow Texas Rep. Ralph M. Hall (R) is 10th.

3rd

Texas is 3rd on Roll Call's Clout Index, which measures influence in Congress by state.

Rep. Steve Stockman has no appearances on Sunday talk shows.

Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) has the most appearances so far this year.











Roll Call and CQ Weekly use ratings assigned by the Rothenberg Political Report, which are defined as follows: SAFE: As of today, the party indicated is all but certain to win the seat. FAVORED: One candidate has a substantial advantage, but an upset is still possible. LEAN: The party indicated has the edge, but the outcome is less certain than for races rated as favored. TILT: The outcome is effectively regarded as a tossup for each of these highly competitive seats, although the party indicated has a slight edge. TOSSUP: Neither party has an edge in these contests.